Dear colleagues!

I've never thought that it is not so easy to present my own program. Every time imaging myself at the place of a person who can potentially apply the program MODEN in his work, I wonder: "Is it easier and simpler to do everything without the use of the program?" Overwhelmingly my answer is:  "It is easier and faster to do without the use of the program. Am I sure that the reason is not my laziness?"

Most recently we performed the project of vapour heat utilization from brewing boiler. We drew out a scheme of utilization, came to agreement with our customer and it seems that everything in the scheme was logical. I've decided to perform simulation. And . . . all the system bit the dust. Of course, I had only myself to blame that did not reconcile operating modes of the equipment and so on. Fortunately, I've managed to turn back and create a new scheme.

A case nearly approaching this one happened on treatment facilities. We were searching for the method of heat utilization of compressed air heated by airblower. And at this time both we and our customer were inclined to take a traditional decision, though its effect was not great. We performed a rather detail simulation, made some kind of a brainstorm and adopted a rated and neat problem solving with significant economic effect.

That's why it is simpler and quicker without a program, but . . . If we want to compete, search for new optimal solutions not only in large, but also in small, make progress, then we shouldn't indulge to our laziness. And I wish me and you to do that!

If you have any questions (about the program, cooperation, etc.), please, forward them to our forum or e-mail.

We invite you to our website.

Director of  Energovent, Gregory Volov
Minsk, June 2008

P.S. By the way, have you ever try to create mathematical model of the outside world by means of four elements (channels, ports, objects and structures, according to our terminology)?